The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

Do rebrands work? Can you trademark an X? An expert answers the burning questions on Musk's Twitter pivot

  • Written by Cameron Shackell, Sessional Academic, Visitor, Queensland University of Technology
Do rebrands work? Can you trademark an X? An expert answers the burning questions on Musk's Twitter pivot

To non-moguls, Elon Musk’s (perhaps temporary) rebrand of Twitter to “X” may seem high risk, amateurish, or even capricious. But it is likely doing exactly what he intended: generating enormous global interest, pushing Twitter closer to his other X brands (SpaceX[1], Tesla Model X[2], xAI[3]), and clearing the way for a profitable merging of technologies.

What happened to the blue bird?

Last weekend, Musk began the (reversible) changes by renaming the Twitter platform X on its website and replacing the iconic blue bird logo[4] with a crowdsourced “interim[5]” white “X” on a black background.

Later, Musk posted an image of the character projected on the firm’s San Francisco headquarters[6] and tweeted[7] (or is that “X’d”?) that x.com now redirects to twitter.com.

The X bears a strong resemblance to the Unicode character[8] “mathematical double-struck capital X”, derived from the way bold characters are usually written on blackboards[9] in maths lectures. The logo is still undergoing iterations, with a short-lived thickening of the lines[10] going live on July 26, before Musk announced he didn’t like it and would revert.

Linda Yaccarino, Twitter’s CEO and potential scapegoat[11] if the rebrand goes wrong, also confirmed the launch on Sunday, tweeting[12], “X is here! Let’s do this.”

Read more: Elon Musk's 'hardcore' management style: a case study in what not to do[13]

Has a radical rebrand ever succeeded?

In 2021, Facebook rebranded its holding company to Meta. But it kept “Facebook”, gave us the metaverse[14], and didn’t deprive the world of a cute feathery icon and concept of “tweeting”.

Branding experts around the globe have been quick to condemn the Twitter shakeup as too sudden and destructive of brand capital[15]. That’s perhaps because even slight name changes are known to be risky. Kentucky Fried Chicken officially rebranded to KFC[16]. Pepsi was once Pepsi-Cola. These successful adjustments took time and careful management.

Dramatic renaming of a household name has basically never worked. And there’s no doubt a black “X” replacing “Twitter” is dramatic. It smashes the metaphor of birds updating one another in an idyllic blue-sky ecosystem. Sentimental fans holding out for a return to the good old days have now got the memo: Twitter isn’t for you.

An @ sign, a w and a t lie on the pavement in front of an orange elevated work platform
A worker talks with San Francisco police officers after his work to remove lettering from the iconic vertical Twitter sign at the company’s headquarters was halted on July 24 2023. A San Francisco police spokesperson said Twitter had a work order to take the sign down but didn’t communicate this to security and the property owner of the building. EPA/John G. Mabanglo/AAP

But perhaps that’s the point. To me, X – a symbol that can be a cattle marker or an illiterate signature – seems like a probe to perturb and test the market.

Musk isn’t renaming fast food or soft drinks. Twitter is in the hyper-dynamic business of information. Musk is agile and well armed. So maybe new branding rules are being forged.

Musk’s progressive alienation of Twitter’s traditional users could be an attempt to refresh the platform’s demographic – to draw in those true to his other brands, while shaking off unprofitable sceptics. This would certainly fit with the push X gives towards Musk’s other X brands.

Most commentators have latched onto the idea the change is sudden, irreversible, and complete in one day. But Musk’s past business endeavours suggest he is a strategist. The change will take time to play out and can likely be revised, reversed and adjusted as feedback is generated.

Read more: What will Elon Musk's ownership of Twitter mean for 'free speech' on the platform?[17]

Doesn’t someone else own the “X” trademark?

Trademarking of “X” is probably not pivotal to the Twitter rebrand. But achieving limited ownership of the letter is not as preposterous as it sounds.

Trademarks are granted or refused based on their ability to identify the source of the associated goods or services. This means X can function as a trademark if it clearly identifies Twitter in the minds of the public (provided another Twitter-like service doesn’t currently hold the trademark). Famous brands have advantages: Musk has already garnered enough media attention to ensure X is now a globally recognised term for his company.

Is X a generic term and thus not trademarkable? My own research[18] argues trademarks used by tech firms involved in consumer search and decision making (like Twitter) are inherently generic[19]. But under the 77-year-old Lanham Act[20] that still governs trademarks in the United States, X would have to be a common generic name for all services like Twitter to be refused. It isn’t. It’s mostly just a generic term for the 24th letter of the alphabet.

Speculation about the legality of X as a trademark is one thing. My time writing about trademarks[21], has taught me the reality in courts and tribunals is another. Both Microsoft and Meta[22] (and many others) have laid claims to X in the past for various goods and services.

Lawsuits over X may be filed, but final determinations could be years in the courts. And if things go badly, Musk has just shown his willingness to pivot.

Read more: The 'digital town square'? What does it mean when billionaires own the online spaces where we gather?[23]

What is Musk trying to achieve?

Tech commentators are intrigued by the idea the X rebrand is part of Musk’s plan[24] to create a WeChat[25]-style “everything app[26]” that would converge messaging, search, online shopping and mobile payment. Twitter CEO, Yaccarino, has said as much[27].

I find that analysis too simplistic, especially given the ongoing focus on antitrust[28]. Musk is arguably in a position to survey (and reshape) the landscape of not just “town square” discourse but space travel, artificial intelligence (AI), transportation and even politics[29]. He operates on a scale incompatible with endgames. I sense the X rebrand is more about a direction of travel. Or even a sacrifice for a greater goal.

The X rebrand could relate to AI (Musk had a role in a data drought[30] this year by restricting Twitter data access). Or it could be testing the waters for a different pivot later in the year. Or it could be an attempt to distract from some other move. There’s no way to know.

Even the phrase “time will tell” is no help. How can we know if an unknown plan succeeds or not? Does Musk care if Twitter disappears? Does he care if he is worth two hundred billion or three hundred billion?

Welcome to the inscrutable world of X.

References

  1. ^ SpaceX (www.spacex.com)
  2. ^ Tesla Model X (en.wikipedia.org)
  3. ^ xAI (x.ai)
  4. ^ iconic blue bird logo (www.nytimes.com)
  5. ^ interim (twitter.com)
  6. ^ projected on the firm’s San Francisco headquarters (twitter.com)
  7. ^ tweeted (twitter.com)
  8. ^ Unicode character (www.compart.com)
  9. ^ written on blackboards (en.wikipedia.org)
  10. ^ short-lived thickening of the lines (www.theverge.com)
  11. ^ potential scapegoat (fortune.com)
  12. ^ tweeting (twitter.com)
  13. ^ Elon Musk's 'hardcore' management style: a case study in what not to do (theconversation.com)
  14. ^ metaverse (www.wired.com)
  15. ^ destructive of brand capital (www.businessinsider.com)
  16. ^ officially rebranded to KFC (www.snopes.com)
  17. ^ What will Elon Musk's ownership of Twitter mean for 'free speech' on the platform? (theconversation.com)
  18. ^ My own research (journals.sagepub.com)
  19. ^ generic (en.wikipedia.org)
  20. ^ Lanham Act (www.law.cornell.edu)
  21. ^ writing about trademarks (www.worldtrademarkreview.com)
  22. ^ Microsoft and Meta (www.reuters.com)
  23. ^ The 'digital town square'? What does it mean when billionaires own the online spaces where we gather? (theconversation.com)
  24. ^ Musk’s plan (www.businessinsider.com)
  25. ^ WeChat (www.wechat.com)
  26. ^ everything app (www.forbes.com)
  27. ^ has said as much (twitter.com)
  28. ^ antitrust (hbr.org)
  29. ^ politics (www.theguardian.com)
  30. ^ data drought (www.worldtrademarkreview.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/do-rebrands-work-can-you-trademark-an-x-an-expert-answers-the-burning-questions-on-musks-twitter-pivot-210377

Times Magazine

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Science Behind Reverse Osmosis and Why It Matters

What is reverse osmosis? Reverse osmosis (RO) is a water purification process that removes contaminants by forcing water through a semi-permeable membrane. This membrane allows only water molecules to pass through while blocking impurities such as...

Foodbank Queensland celebrates local hero for National Volunteer Week

Stephen Carey is a bit bananas.   He splits his time between his insurance broker business, caring for his young family, and volunteering for Foodbank Queensland one day a week. He’s even run the Bridge to Brisbane in a banana suit to raise mon...

Senior of the Year Nominations Open

The Allan Labor Government is encouraging all Victorians to recognise the valuable contributions of older members of our community by nominating them for the 2025 Victorian Senior of the Year Awards.  Minister for Ageing Ingrid Stitt today annou...

The Times Features

How to Tell If Your Eyes Are Working Harder Than They Should Be

Image by freepik Most of us take our vision for granted—until it starts to let us down. Whether it's squinting at your phone, rubbing your eyes at the end of the day, or feeling ...

Ways to Attract Tenants in a Competitive Rental Market

In the kind of rental market we’ve got now, standing out is half the battle. The other half? Actually getting someone to sign that lease. With interest rates doing backflips and ...

Top Tips for Finding the Ideal Block to Build Your Home

There’s something deeply personal and exciting about building your own home. You’re not just choosing paint colours or furniture, you’re creating a space that reflects your lifes...

The Home Buying Process Explained Step by Step

Buying a home is a thrilling milestone, but it can also feel like navigating a maze without a map. With paperwork, finances, and decisions at every turn, understanding the home-b...

Thinking of Selling Your Home? Here’s What You Need to Know

Selling a home is more than just putting up a “For Sale” sign. It’s a strategic process that involves preparation, pricing, and negotiation - all aimed at getting the best value ...

Smart Ways to Earn Passive Income from Real Estate

Imagine making money without doing much work. You get paid even while you sleep, travel, or do fun things. This is called passive income. Indeed, real estate has great ways to do...