The Times Australia
Mirvac Harbourside
The Times World News

.

America survived a decade of anger in the 18th century – but can it now?

  • Written by Maurizio Valsania, Professor of American History, Università di Torino
America survived a decade of anger in the 18th century – but can it now?

Americans have an anger problem[1].

People rage at each other[2]. They are angry at public officials[3] for shutting down parts of society. Or for the opposite reason because they aren’t doing enough to curb the virus[4]. Democrats vent their rage at Republicans. And Republicans treat Democrats not as opponents, but as enemies[5].

Meanwhile, the American founders are being literally taken off of their pedestals[6] in a rejection of the history they represent. And, of course, a violent mob of Donald Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in early 2021, trying to disrupt that most fundamental of U.S. institutions, the peaceful transfer of presidential power.

But public rage and hysteria in America aren’t new. The 1790s, as well, were a period of political violence.

Over that entire decade, political opponents pelted each other with the accusation that they had lost the true American principles. Just as today, delusion stood in place of reality[7].

Despite that decade of rage, however, America came together as a nation. Today’s rage-filled country may not end the same way.

Trump supporters and police, clashing as they push barricades and storm the U.S. Capitol.
A pro-Trump mob storms the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021. Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images[8]

Strong passions, angry mobs

Following a 1791 tax on whiskey[9], western Pennsylvania was set ablaze. Angry mobs torched buildings. Federal tax inspectors were beaten up, stripped naked and tarred and feathered[10]. A few people died.

Political discourse was similarly inflamed. Passions were strong. Articles appeared in newspapers that portrayed President George Washington as a scoundrel, a swindler, the king of all Pied Pipers[11].

“If ever a nation was debauched by a man, the American nation has been debauched by WASHINGTON[12],” read the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser from December 1796. “If ever a nation has suffered from the improper influence of a man, the American nation has suffered from the influence of WASHINGTON.”

One could also hear Virginians drinking to the toast “A speedy Death to General Washington[13].”

Thomas Jefferson noticed that times had changed. He had seen warm debates and high political passions before, but never such levels of bigotry: “Men who have been intimate all their lives cross the streets to avoid meeting, and turn their heads another way, lest they should be obliged to touch their hat[14],” he wrote in June 1797.

America as family

As a historian of the early republic[15], I offer that if Americans have always been so angry and ready to snap, it is because they care – at least at some level, at least instinctively. Popular despondency and disillusionment would be much worse.

They may not admit it, but Americans care because the United States is like a family – and in the family, passions are strong.

This is no sentimentalism: Americans have long defined themselves as a family. They’ve done it from the birth of the republic.

A quick reading of the Constitution[16] shows that the nation has never been treated as a contract among strangers, a deal that could be severed at short notice. It was conceptualized as an expansive family, a living organism, the truest embodiment of “We The People.”

In the late 18th century, the framers of the Constitution[17] saw affection as the defining trait of the American experiment; but the main problem, for them, was to build and sustain affection.

Do not listen, framer James Madison averred[18], “to the unnatural voice which tells you that the people of America, knit together as they are by so many cords of affection, can no longer live together as members of the same family; can no longer continue the mutual guardians of their mutual happiness; can no longer be fellow citizens of one great, respectable, and flourishing empire.”

During the years of the Revolution, it was relatively easy. An external enemy, the British, was a sufficient incentive for Americans to love one another.

With independence gained, things got murky. Alexander Hamilton, the most famous among the framers, was uncomfortable[19]: “Upon the same principle that a man is more attached to his family than to his neighborhood, to his neighborhood than to the community at large, the people of each State would be apt to feel a stronger bias towards their local governments than towards the government of the Union.”

The presidential portrait of James Madison, white-haired, wearing a white shirt and black jacket Founding father James Madison described Americans as ‘knit together … by so many cords of affection.’ National Archives/Hulton Archive/Getty Images[20]

Sticking together

Devising practical methods to boost attachment and counter rage was the big challenge of the 1790s. As professor of government Emily Pears[21] points out, 18th-century political leaders suggested three main approaches to achieve this[22].

The first was building a better federal administration that could deliver personal and material benefits to its citizens. Providing funding for infrastructure, creating efficient networks for commerce or levying equitable taxes would eventually win people’s attachments.

The second was forming shared cultural practices. Making citizens feel that they have the same political values, and that there is a common history and tradition they are part of, would generate pride and comradeship. Symbols like flags, songs, toasts or parades would help develop these connections.

[The Conversation’s Politics + Society editors pick need-to-know stories. Sign up for Politics Weekly[23].]

The third was trying to increase participation. Through the process of voting, citizens would get closer to one another and to their representatives. Participation would make connections stronger, thus fostering affection.

Can the center hold?

Whether any of these three approaches is still viable today is unclear.

The first, the utilitarian approach, depends on leaders’ ability to tackle issues of social justice and inclusion: Who are the beneficiaries of the federal government? Who are its citizens?

The second, the cultural approach, is obviously marred by the “other side” of national history, slavery. The question is unavoidable: Whose history, whose traditions are Americans talking about?

And the third, the participatory approach, is discouraged by the very parties that put obstacles in place. Is there a way to get rid of gerrymandering and other barriers[24] to full representation?

And yet, finding strategies that would enhance emotional bonds is crucial to any nation. Especially today. Rage is on the rise[25]. Eventually, popular despondency and disillusionment may come.

Family will be broken.

References

  1. ^ an anger problem (doi.org)
  2. ^ People rage at each other (youtu.be)
  3. ^ are angry at public officials (www.bbc.com)
  4. ^ they aren’t doing enough to curb the virus (www.washingtonpost.com)
  5. ^ not as opponents, but as enemies (www.washingtonpost.com)
  6. ^ taken off of their pedestals (www.nytimes.com)
  7. ^ delusion stood in place of reality (www.jstor.org)
  8. ^ Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images (www.gettyimages.com)
  9. ^ 1791 tax on whiskey (www.history.com)
  10. ^ tarred and feathered (revolution.h-net.msu.edu)
  11. ^ portrayed President George Washington as a scoundrel, a swindler, the king of all Pied Pipers (www.washingtonpost.com)
  12. ^ the American nation has been debauched by WASHINGTON (washingtonpapers.org)
  13. ^ A speedy Death to General Washington (www.americanheritage.com)
  14. ^ lest they should be obliged to touch their hat (founders.archives.gov)
  15. ^ As a historian of the early republic (unito.academia.edu)
  16. ^ the Constitution (www.senate.gov)
  17. ^ framers of the Constitution (www.archives.gov)
  18. ^ Do not listen, framer James Madison averred (avalon.law.yale.edu)
  19. ^ Alexander Hamilton, the most famous among the framers, was uncomfortable (avalon.law.yale.edu)
  20. ^ National Archives/Hulton Archive/Getty Images (www.gettyimages.com)
  21. ^ Emily Pears (www.cmc.edu)
  22. ^ three main approaches to achieve this (kansaspress.ku.edu)
  23. ^ Sign up for Politics Weekly (theconversation.com)
  24. ^ gerrymandering and other barriers (theconversation.com)
  25. ^ Rage is on the rise (www.washingtonpost.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/political-rage-america-survived-a-decade-of-anger-in-the-18th-century-but-can-it-now-172179

Mirvac Harbourside

Times Magazine

YepAI Joins Victoria's AI Trade Mission to Singapore for Big Data & AI World Asia 2025

YepAI, a Melbourne-based leader in enterprise artificial intelligence solutions, announced today...

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an onli...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beau...

5 Ways Microsoft Fabric Simplifies Your Data Analytics Workflow

In today's data-driven world, businesses are constantly seeking ways to streamline their data anal...

7 Questions to Ask Before You Sign IT Support Companies in Sydney

Choosing an IT partner can feel like buying an insurance policy you hope you never need. The right c...

Choosing the Right Legal Aid Lawyer in Sutherland Shire: Key Considerations

Legal aid services play an essential role in ensuring access to justice for all. For people in t...

The Times Features

Macquarie Bank Democratises Agentic AI, Scaling Customer Innovation with Gemini Enterprise

Macquarie’s Banking and Financial Services group (Macquarie Bank), in collaboration with Google ...

Do kids really need vitamin supplements?

Walk down the health aisle of any supermarket and you’ll see shelves lined with brightly packa...

Why is it so shameful to have missing or damaged teeth?

When your teeth and gums are in good condition, you might not even notice their impact on your...

Australian travellers at risk of ATM fee rip-offs according to new data from Wise

Wise, the global technology company building the smartest way to spend and manage money internat...

Does ‘fasted’ cardio help you lose weight? Here’s the science

Every few years, the concept of fasted exercise training pops up all over social media. Faste...

How Music and Culture Are Shaping Family Road Trips in Australia

School holiday season is here, and Aussies aren’t just hitting the road - they’re following the musi...

The Role of Spinal Physiotherapy in Recovery and Long-Term Wellbeing

Back pain and spinal conditions are among the most common reasons people seek medical support, oft...

Italian Lamb Ragu Recipe: The Best Ragù di Agnello for Pasta

Ciao! It’s Friday night, and the weekend is calling for a little Italian magic. What’s better than t...

It’s OK to use paracetamol in pregnancy. Here’s what the science says about the link with autism

United States President Donald Trump has urged pregnant women[1] to avoid paracetamol except in ...