The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

Why taxing US billionaires’ wealth – as Biden tried to do – will never work

  • Written by Beverly Moran, Professor Emerita of Law, Vanderbilt University
Why taxing US billionaires’ wealth – as Biden tried to do – will never work

The speed with which a tax on billionaires came and went[1] as a means to pay for President Joe Biden’s economic agenda shows why it’s so hard to tax wealth in the U.S.

Democrats unveiled their proposal[2] on Oct. 27, 2021, and it was nixed that same day, replaced with a surcharge on millionaire incomes[3].

The idea of taxing the richest Americans’ fortunes has been batted around for some time, and perhaps with good reason from a tax perspective. The total wealth of U.S. billionaires soared by US$1.8 trillion during the COVID-19 pandemic[4] as of mid-August. And recent reporting has found that despite their massive riches, billionaires tend to pay very little in taxes[5].

As an expert on tax policy[6], I have observed that there’s a big obstacle standing in the way of a wealth tax: the Constitution.

Income and wealth inequality

Concerns about inequality have increased in recent decades.

Americans enjoyed substantial economic growth[7] and broadly shared prosperity from the end of World War II into the 1970s.

But in the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan dramatically slashed taxes on the wealthy[8] – twice – cutting the top rate on wages from 70% to 28%.

Studies have shown lower income and corporate tax rates, combined with other “trickle-down” policies such as deregulation, have led to steadily rising income for the richest Americans and wealth inequality[9].

The most affluent 1% controlled 39%[10] of all wealth[11] – including all cash, real estate, stocks, bonds and other investments – in 2016, up from less than 30% in 1989. At the same time, the bottom 90% held less than a quarter of America’s wealth, compared with more than a third in 1989.

Currently, the federal government taxes all income above $518,400[12] at 37% for single filers, with an additional 3.8% investment tax[13] on incomes over $200,000. Of course, as a ProPublica cache of tax documents shows, loopholes and tax dodges result in actual income tax rates being[14] significantly lower.

The problem with taxing wealth

Unlike an income tax, a wealth tax reaches the root[15] of both wealth and income inequality.

But there are strong[16] arguments[17] that a federal wealth tax is unconstitutional[18]. Wealth taxes violate Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which forbids the federal government from assessing “direct taxes” that aren’t apportioned equally among the states[19].

A direct tax is a tax on a thing[20], like property or income. An indirect tax is a tax on a transaction: for example, a sale or a gift.

The income tax is a direct tax and constitutional because of the 16th Amendment[21], which specifically allows income taxes without apportionment. As for property, you may notice that only states and cities levy real estate taxes[22]. In almost every case, the federal government cannot tax real estate or any other form of wealth absent a transaction.

Proponents of a wealth tax, such as U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, cite a small group[23] of law professors who back her claim that a wealth tax passes constitutional muster. But the argument against constitutionality is strong enough that a Supreme Court challenge is sure to follow any attempt to enact a wealth tax[24].

Barring a victory before the conservative-leaning Supreme Court or an arduous amendment to the Constitution[25], the federal government is shut out of taxing wealth.

A rising tide

I agree with progressive lawmakers that the United States should return to economic policies that seek to lift all boats[26].

Although American wealth and productivity have surged in the past 40 years, most Americans have not seen their lot improve nearly as much[27] as the richest have[28] – and are paying higher tax rates[29]. In 2020 alone, America’s billionaires saw their wealth increase $560 billion[30], even as tens of millions were unemployed[31] or depended on food donations[32] to get enough to eat.

The U.S. tax system is at least partly responsible for these gaps. While a wealth tax may not be a workable solution, there are other means, such as higher income tax rates for the well-to-do or a wealth transfer tax[33] that focuses on the transfer of wealth to a billionaire’s heirs. These approaches could not only help solve the problem of inequality but would pass legal muster too.

This is an updated version of an article published[34] on June 9, 2021.

References

  1. ^ came and went (www.axios.com)
  2. ^ unveiled their proposal (www.axios.com)
  3. ^ replaced with a surcharge on millionaire incomes (www.nytimes.com)
  4. ^ soared by US$1.8 trillion during the COVID-19 pandemic (ips-dc.org)
  5. ^ billionaires tend to pay very little in taxes (www.propublica.org)
  6. ^ expert on tax policy (papers.ssrn.com)
  7. ^ enjoyed substantial economic growth (www.cbpp.org)
  8. ^ President Ronald Reagan dramatically slashed taxes on the wealthy (www.brookings.edu)
  9. ^ have led to steadily rising income for the richest Americans and wealth inequality (www.thebalance.com)
  10. ^ controlled 39% (www.cbpp.org)
  11. ^ wealth (www.m1finance.com)
  12. ^ taxes all income above $518,400 (www.nerdwallet.com)
  13. ^ an additional 3.8% investment tax (www.thebalance.com)
  14. ^ result in actual income tax rates being (www.propublica.org)
  15. ^ reaches the root (theweek.com)
  16. ^ strong (taxfoundation.org)
  17. ^ arguments (nymag.com)
  18. ^ unconstitutional (theconversation.com)
  19. ^ apportioned equally among the states (constitutingamerica.org)
  20. ^ is a tax on a thing (www.salon.com)
  21. ^ because of the 16th Amendment (www.law.cornell.edu)
  22. ^ only states and cities levy real estate taxes (www.financialsamurai.com)
  23. ^ cite a small group (www.bloomberg.com)
  24. ^ is sure to follow any attempt to enact a wealth tax (minnlawyer.com)
  25. ^ an arduous amendment to the Constitution (www.archives.gov)
  26. ^ seek to lift all boats (www.economist.com)
  27. ^ have not seen their lot improve nearly as much (www.latimes.com)
  28. ^ richest have (inequality.org)
  29. ^ are paying higher tax rates (www.propublica.org)
  30. ^ America’s billionaires saw their wealth increase $560 billion (www.forbes.com)
  31. ^ were unemployed (www.bls.gov)
  32. ^ depended on food donations (philanthropynewsdigest.org)
  33. ^ wealth transfer tax (www.taxpolicycenter.org)
  34. ^ article published (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/why-taxing-us-billionaires-wealth-as-biden-tried-to-do-will-never-work-170907

Times Magazine

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an online presence that reflects your brand, engages your audience, and drives results. For local businesses in the Blue Mountains, a well-designed website a...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beauty On Saturday, September 6th, history will be made as the International Polo Tour (IPT), a sports leader headquartered here in South Florida...

5 Ways Microsoft Fabric Simplifies Your Data Analytics Workflow

In today's data-driven world, businesses are constantly seeking ways to streamline their data analytics processes. The sheer volume and complexity of data can be overwhelming, often leading to bottlenecks and inefficiencies. Enter the innovative da...

7 Questions to Ask Before You Sign IT Support Companies in Sydney

Choosing an IT partner can feel like buying an insurance policy you hope you never need. The right choice keeps your team productive, your data safe, and your budget predictable. The wrong choice shows up as slow tickets, surprise bills, and risky sh...

Choosing the Right Legal Aid Lawyer in Sutherland Shire: Key Considerations

Legal aid services play an essential role in ensuring access to justice for all. For people in the Sutherland Shire who may not have the financial means to pay for private legal assistance, legal aid ensures that everyone has access to representa...

Watercolor vs. Oil vs. Digital: Which Medium Fits Your Pet's Personality?

When it comes to immortalizing your pet’s unique personality in art, choosing the right medium is essential. Each artistic medium, whether watercolor, oil, or digital, has distinct qualities that can bring out the spirit of your furry friend in dif...

The Times Features

How much money do you need to be happy? Here’s what the research says

Over the next decade, Elon Musk could become the world’s first trillionaire[1]. The Tesla board recently proposed a US$1 trillion (A$1.5 trillion) compensation plan, if Musk ca...

NSW has a new fashion sector strategy – but a sustainable industry needs a federally legislated response

The New South Wales government recently announced the launch of the NSW Fashion Sector Strategy, 2025–28[1]. The strategy, developed in partnership with the Australian Fashion ...

From Garden to Gift: Why Roses Make the Perfect Present

Think back to the last time you gave or received flowers. Chances are, roses were part of the bunch, or maybe they were the whole bunch.   Roses tend to leave an impression. Even ...

Do I have insomnia? 5 reasons why you might not

Even a single night of sleep trouble can feel distressing and lonely. You toss and turn, stare at the ceiling, and wonder how you’ll cope tomorrow. No wonder many people star...

Wedding Photography Trends You Need to Know (Before You Regret Your Album)

Your wedding album should be a timeless keepsake, not something you cringe at years later. Trends may come and go, but choosing the right wedding photography approach ensures your ...

Can you say no to your doctor using an AI scribe?

Doctors’ offices were once private. But increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI) scribes (also known as digital scribes) are listening in. These tools can record and trans...