Google AI
The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

Mobile phones are not linked to brain cancer, according to a major review of 28 years of research

  • Written by: Sarah Loughran, Director Radiation Research and Advice (ARPANSA), and Adjunct Associate Professor (UOW), University of Wollongong

A systematic review into the potential health effects from radio wave exposure has shown mobile phones are not linked to brain cancer. The review was commissioned by the World Health Organization and is published today in the journal Environment International[1].

Mobile phones are often held against the head during use. And they emit radio waves, a type of non-ionising radiation[2]. These two factors are largely why the idea mobile phones might cause brain cancer emerged in the first place.

The possibility that mobile phones might cause cancer has been a long-standing concern. Mobile phones – and wireless tech more broadly – are a major part of our daily lives. So it’s been vital for science to address the safety of radio wave exposure from these devices.

Over the years, the scientific consensus has remained strong – there’s no association between mobile phone radio waves and brain cancer, or health more generally.

Radiation as a possible carcinogen

Despite the consensus, occasional research studies have been published that suggested the possibility of harm.

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radio wave exposure as a possible carcinogen to humans[3]. The meaning of this classification was largely misunderstood and led to some increase in concern.

IARC is part of the World Health Organization. Its classification of radio waves as a possible carcinogen was largely based on limited evidence from human observational studies. Also known as epidemiological studies, they observe the rate of disease and how it may be caused in human populations.

Observational studies are the best tool researchers have to investigate long-term health effects in humans, but the results can often be biased.

The IARC classification relied on previous observational studies where people with brain cancer reported they used a mobile phone more than they actually did. One example of this is known as the INTERPHONE study[4].

This new systematic review of human observational studies is based on a much larger data set compared to what the IARC examined in 2011.

It includes more recent and more comprehensive studies. This means we can now be more confident that exposure to radio waves from mobile phones or wireless technologies is not associated with an increased risk of brain cancer.

A woman on a park bench talking on the phone with an earbud in her ear.
Mobile phones were traditionally held against the head, but these days people also use earphones or have video calls. iva_evva/Shutterstock[5]

No association

The new review forms part of a series of systematic reviews[6] commissioned by the World Health Organization to look more closely at possible health effects associated with exposure to radio waves.

This systematic review provides the strongest evidence to date that radio waves from wireless technologies are not a hazard to human health.

It is the most comprehensive review on this topic – it considered more than 5,000 studies, of which 63, published between 1994 and 2022, were included in the final analysis. The main reason studies were excluded was that they were not actually relevant; this is very normal with search results from systematic reviews.

No association between mobile phone use and brain cancer, or any other head or neck cancer, was found.

There was also no association with cancer if a person used a mobile phone for ten or more years (prolonged use). How often they used it – either based on the number of calls or the time spent on the phone – also didn’t make a difference.

Importantly, these findings align with previous research[7]. It shows that, although the use of wireless technologies has massively increased in the past few decades, there has been no rise in the incidence of brain cancers.

A good thing

Overall, the results are very reassuring. They mean that our national[8] and international[9] safety limits are protective. Mobile phones emit low-level radio waves below these safety limits, and there is no evidence exposure to these has an impact on human health.

Despite this, it is important that research continues. Technology is developing at a rapid pace. With this development comes the use of radio waves in different ways using different frequencies. It is therefore essential that science continues to ensure radio wave exposure from these technologies remains safe.

The challenge we now face is making sure this new research counteracts the persistent misconceptions and misinformation out there regarding mobile phones and brain cancer.

There remains no evidence of any established health effects from exposures related to mobile phones, and that is a good thing.

References

  1. ^ in the journal Environment International (doi.org)
  2. ^ non-ionising radiation (www.arpansa.gov.au)
  3. ^ radio wave exposure as a possible carcinogen to humans (www.iarc.who.int)
  4. ^ the INTERPHONE study (academic.oup.com)
  5. ^ iva_evva/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  6. ^ series of systematic reviews (www.sciencedirect.com)
  7. ^ previous research (bmjopen.bmj.com)
  8. ^ national (www.arpansa.gov.au)
  9. ^ international (www.icnirp.org)

Read more https://theconversation.com/mobile-phones-are-not-linked-to-brain-cancer-according-to-a-major-review-of-28-years-of-research-237882

Times Magazine

Federal Budget and Motoring: Luxury Car Tax, Fuel Excise and the Cost of Driving in Australia

For millions of Australians, the Federal Budget is not an abstract economic document discussed onl...

Buying a New Car: Insider Tips

Buying a new car is one of the largest purchases many Australians make outside buying a home. Yet ...

Hybrid Vehicles: What Is a Hybrid, an EV and a Plug-In Hybrid?

Australia’s car market is changing faster than at any point since the decline of the local Holden ...

Chinese Cars: If You Are Not Willing to Risk Buying One, What Are the Current Affordable Petrol Alternatives

For years Australian motorists shopping for an affordable new car generally looked toward familiar...

Australia’s East Coast Braces for Wet Week as Weather Pattern Shifts

Large sections of Australia’s east coast are preparing for a significant period of wet weather as ...

A Report From France: The Mood of a Nation

France occupies a unique place in the global imagination. To many outsiders, it remains the land ...

The Times Features

Restaurants Are Packed Again — So Why Are Australians S…

Australians still love dining out. Despite years of inflation, rising interest rates, higher rents...

Real Estate and the Federal Budget: Early Signs Emergin…

Australia’s federal budget has landed, and while economists, investors and political strategists c...

The Modern Causes of Back Pain and What You Can Do

Key Highlights Modern lifestyles are a major contributor to ongoing back painPosture, movement, a...

What to Know About Adding Natural Oils to Your Wellness…

Key Highlights Natural oils are commonly used to support everyday wellbeingConsistency and qualit...

How Online Mental Health Support Is Changing Access to …

Key Highlights Online mental health services are improving accessibility for many individualsFlex...

Why every drop counts

Accurate water measurement and confidence in Sustainable Diversion Limits (SDLs) are essential to ...

Dining Out Is Expensive. Buying High Quality Meat and F…

For many Australians, dining out has quietly shifted from a weekly habit to an occasional indulgen...

REFLECTIONS: A Legacy in the Rain at Carla Zampatti AFW…

Words & Photography by Cesar Ocampo There is a specific kind of magic that happens when high fa...

Where Our Batteries Come From: Battery making is big bu…

Batteries are now so deeply embedded in modern life that most people rarely stop to think about th...