The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

Special votes mean National and ACT will likely lose their majority

  • Written by Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne

This Friday at 2pm (12pm AEDT), New Zealanders will find out the final results of the October 14 election. This tally will include the estimated 567,000 special votes not reported in the preliminary results on election night.

Special votes tend to take a long time to count because they include votes cast outside a voter’s home electorate[1]. These votes need to be posted back to the home electorate and checked against the electoral roll before they can be counted.

The decision to release the results on a predetermined day three weeks after the election, rather than providing progress updates as the count is completed, has been criticised[2]. Rolling updates during the counting process, much like Australian state and federal electoral commissions, are preferable.

In past elections, special votes have favoured left-wing parties[3], costing the right one or two seats from the preliminary results.

It’s expected 2023 will follow the same pattern. If it does, this will mean the two party coalition made up of the National Party and ACT will need to expand to include NZ First.

So what are the possible combinations New Zealand could see when parliament sits next?

Special votes likely to hurt National

According to the preliminary results[4], National won 50 of the 121 seats in parliament, Labour 34, the Greens 14, ACT 11, NZ First eight and te Pāti Māori/the Māori party four. This gave the right-wing coalition of National and ACT 61 seats, just enough for a majority.

But the results, as they stand, point to the distinct possibility of an “overhang”. An “overhang” occurs when a party wins more single-member electorates than their party vote should entitle them to.

This year, te Pāti Māori won four of the seven Māori-roll electorates on a party vote of 2.6%. They were entitled to three seats, but kept their fourth seat with parliament expanded to 121 seats from the normal 120.

Read more: NZ election 2023: Labour out, National in – either way, neoliberalism wins again[5]

Some commentators believe the most likely outcome[6] after counting of special votes is for National to lose two seats, one to Labour and one to te Pāti Māori. However, the seat gained by te Pāti Māori would entitle them to four seats, eliminating the overhang.

If this happens, National would end up with 48 seats out of 120 and ACT would stay with 11. The right wing coalition would end up with 59 seats out of 120 – not enough for a majority.

Even if National, as expected, wins the November 25 by-election in Port Waikato[7] that was triggered by the death of an ACT candidate after early voting had begun, the right coalition would hold 60 of the 121 seats, one short of a majority. Labour, the Greens and ACT won’t contest the by-election, so National’s only significant opponent is NZ First.

In this likely scenario, National would need NZ First as well as ACT to achieve a parliamentary majority.

The close Māori seats

There are two close Māori electorate seats where Labour is leading te Pāti Māori by under 500 votes in the preliminary results. While the outcome in an electorate seat is usually unimportant for determining seat entitlements, if te Pāti Māori won one or both of the electorates where they currently trail, the overhang would be extended.

If the 2020 vote pattern holds up in both these seats, Labour will narrowly win both[8]. However, the other Māori electorates were much more favourable to te Pāti Māori in 2023 than in 2020. Labour won six Māori seats in 2020 and te Pāti Māori one.

But in 2023, te Pāti Māori has won four electorates while Labour has won one. The other two are too close to call until the results of the special votes have been released.

It is important to note that votes cast outside a voter’s home electorate may reflect the general disposition of the electorate they are cast in. It’s therefore possible that special votes in the close Māori electorates that are cast elsewhere will be better for te Pāti Māori than expected.

A possible but unlikely scenario

There is the outside possibility of a National–ACT majority.

To achieve this, National would need to lose just one seat, and that seat would need to go to te Pāti Māori. At the same time, te Pāti Māori would need to fail in gaining another electorate. This scenario would give National and ACT a combined 60 seats out of 120, as there would be no te Pāti Māori overhang.

Read more: What makes a good political leader – and how can we tell before voting?[9]

National would then need to win the Port Waikato by-election, giving the right coalition parties a total of 61 of the 121 seats – enough for a majority.

This is possible but, based on previous elections, unlikely. About 20% of the overall vote comes from special votes. In 2020, National performed 22% worse[10] in the special votes compared with those counted on the night.

So, the most likely outcome is that NZ First will be needed for a right-wing governing majority.

Read more https://theconversation.com/special-votes-mean-national-and-act-will-likely-lose-their-majority-215994

Times Magazine

AI is failing ‘Humanity’s Last Exam’. So what does that mean for machine intelligence?

How do you translate ancient Palmyrene script from a Roman tombstone? How many paired tendons ...

Does Cloud Accounting Provide Adequate Security for Australian Businesses?

Today, many Australian businesses rely on cloud accounting platforms to manage their finances. Bec...

Freak Weather Spikes ‘Allergic Disease’ and Eczema As Temperatures Dip

“Allergic disease” and eczema cases are spiking due to the current freak weather as the Bureau o...

IPECS Phone System in 2026: The Future of Smart Business Communication

By 2026, business communication is no longer just about making and receiving calls. It’s about speed...

With Nvidia’s second-best AI chips headed for China, the US shifts priorities from security to trade

This week, US President Donald Trump approved previously banned exports[1] of Nvidia’s powerful ...

Navman MiVue™ True 4K PRO Surround honest review

If you drive a car, you should have a dashcam. Need convincing? All I ask that you do is search fo...

The Times Features

What’s behind the surge in the price of gold and silver?

Gold and silver don’t usually move like meme stocks. They grind. They trend. They react to inflati...

State of Play: Nationals vs Liberals

The State of Play with the National Party and How Things Stand with the Liberal Party Australia’s...

SMEs face growing payroll challenges one year in on wage theft reforms

A year after wage theft reforms came into effect, Australian SMEs are confronting a new reality. P...

Evil Ray declares war on the sun

Australia's boldest sunscreen brand Australians love the sun. The sun doesn't love them back. Mela...

Resolutions for Renovations? What to do before renovating in 2026

Rolling into the New Year means many Aussies have fresh plans for their homes with renovat...

Designing an Eco Conscious Kitchen That Lasts

Sustainable kitchens are no longer a passing trend in Australia. They reflect a growing shift towa...

Why Sydney Entrepreneur Aleesha Naxakis is Trading the Boardroom for a Purpose-Driven Crown

Roselands local Aleesha Naxakis is on a mission to prove that life is a gift...

New Year, New Keys: 2026 Strategies for First Home Buyers

We are already over midway through January, and if 2025 was anything to go by, this year will be o...

How to get managers to say yes to flexible work arrangements, according to new research

In the modern workplace, flexible arrangements can be as important as salary[1] for some. For ma...