The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

This election, many adults with disabilities won't be allowed to vote. That should change

  • Written by Wendy Bonython, Associate Professor of Law, Bond University
This election, many adults with disabilities won't be allowed to vote. That should change

This Saturday, most Australians over 18 will vote in the federal election. The right to participate in elections is enshrined in international and domestic human rights law.

Under Australia’s Commonwealth Electoral Act[1], all citizens over 18 are eligible to be entered on the electoral roll[2] and vote in federal elections. Failure to do so, if you meet these requirements, is an offence.

There are some exceptions. Along with people convicted[3] of serious crimes, people of “unsound mind” are ineligible to enrol to vote if they are unable to understand the electoral process or significance of voting.

Typically, this includes people with incapacitating mental illness (such as untreated schizophrenia), or intellectual disability.

Some people won’t be enrolled to begin with. For some, a carer will apply to have them removed from the roll. Endorsement[4] from a medical practitioner is required to have someone removed from the roll.

A need for law reform

“Unsound mind” is archaic language. It predates the 1918 Commonwealth Electoral Act. Historically, people of “unsound mind” were presumed to lack capacity to make legally recognised decisions. Alongside other outdated stigmatising terminology such as “idiocy”, “insanity” and “lunacy”, “unsound mind” has largely been removed from Australian law.

Further statutory reform has responded to the international Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability[5], to which Australia is a signatory. This convention fundamentally changed the law of capacity, including for people with intellectual disability.

Read more: 'Don't shove us off like we're rubbish': what people with intellectual disability told us about their local community[6]

Rather than paternalistically excluding people with disability from decision-making processes by denying them participation or permitting substitute decision-makers to make decisions on their behalf, the Convention requires that people with disability be supported in making their own decisions. That support includes provision of information at an appropriate level.

Guardianship laws, mental health laws, and medical decision-making laws throughout Australia have been updated to reflect a shift towards supported and participative models of decision-making for people with disability.

They reflect both the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability, and modern understandings of capacity, intellectual disability and mental illness. The Convention requires that people with disability have the right to participate in political processes, such as voting in elections.

Many Australians with intellectual disability have previously been declared ineligible to enrol under historic “unsound mind” provisions.

To become eligible, these Australians are required to positively demonstrate they can understand the electoral system, and the significance of voting. That usually requires medical evidence. No other group of prospective voters in Australia is required to demonstrate its competence to vote in this way, regardless of education, literacy, language or engagement with the political system.

This creates a discriminatory barrier for people with disability. It is inconsistent with international human rights law and other Australian law.

Read more: From 'demented' to 'person with dementia': how and why the language of disability changed[7]

Is it feasible?

The Australian Law Reform Commission, in its inquiry[8] into equality, capacity and disability in law, called for reform to the Electoral Act.

In its interim report, the commission called for the legislation to be reworded. Its final report[9] called for the exclusion to be repealed entirely, recognising that retention in any form is discriminatory. Proposals for either reform have so far fallen on deaf ears, notwithstanding support from the Australian Electoral Commission.

Voters in booths from behind
The right to participate in elections is enshrined in international and domestic human rights law. AAP/James Ross

Australia is not the only country waiting to modernise its electoral laws. A range of other countries continue to exclude people with “intellectual disability” from voting. Several European nations such as France[10] have progressively updated their laws. Change is feasible. It does not require that people who are permanently incapable of voting, vote.

One common argument against reforming voting laws to be more inclusive is a perception[11] it would undermine the integrity of the electoral process. Critics claim people with intellectual disability are vulnerable to coercion and accordingly likely to be inappropriately influenced to vote a particular way. Others speculate institutions, such as aged-care facilities, may pressure their clients and residents to vote according to corporate objectives.

Read more: Australia once rejected 'feeble-minded' immigrants. While the language has changed, discrimination remains[12]

In the United Kingdom, where voting is not mandatory, laws[13] that prevented people from voting due to lack of mental capacity were overturned. People with any form of intellectual disability are eligible to vote. However, the law also expressly states decisions on whether to vote, and how to vote, remain the person’s alone. No one is entitled to exercise a vote on their behalf.

If electoral integrity is a concern, the solution is to ensure safeguards adequately protect voters with intellectual disability from inappropriate coercion. Give people with disability an option as to whether they vote, and provide support. Do not deny them access to a fundamental human right.

Read more https://theconversation.com/this-election-many-adults-with-disabilities-wont-be-allowed-to-vote-that-should-change-183130

Active Wear

Times Magazine

World Kindness Day: Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.

What does World Kindness Day mean to you as an individual, and to the Kindness Factory as an organ...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

End-of-Life Planning: Why Talking About Death With Family Makes Funeral Planning Easier

I spend a lot of time talking about death. Not in a morbid, gloomy way—but in the same way we d...

YepAI Joins Victoria's AI Trade Mission to Singapore for Big Data & AI World Asia 2025

YepAI, a Melbourne-based leader in enterprise artificial intelligence solutions, announced today...

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an onli...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beau...

The Times Features

World Kindness Day: Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.

What does World Kindness Day mean to you as an individual, and to the Kindness Factory as an organ...

HoMie opens new Emporium store as a hub for streetwear and community

Melbourne streetwear label HoMie has opened its new store in Emporium Melbourne, but this launch is ...

TAFE NSW empowers women with the skills for small business success

Across New South Wales, TAFE NSW graduates are turning their skills into success, taking what they h...

The median price of residential land sold nationally jumped by 6.8 per cent

Land prices a roadblock to 1.2 million homes target “The median price of residential land sold na...

Farm to Fork Australia Launches Exciting 7th Season on Ten

New Co-Host Magdalena Roze joining Michael Weldon, Courtney Roulston, Louis Tikaram, and Star Guest ...

How GST Revenue is Allocated to Each State or Territory

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is one of the most important revenue streams for Australian gov...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

Higher than expected inflation report dashes hopes for further RBA rate cuts

Inflation jumped 1.3% in the September quarter, above economists’ and the Reserve Bank’s own exp...

How Inflation Influences the RBA’s Determination on Fiscal Policy

Inflation is one of the most important economic indicators in Australia, and it plays a central ro...