The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

One in 1,000 years? Old flood probabilities no longer hold water

  • Written by John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland
One in 1,000 years? Old flood probabilities no longer hold water

Australia’s catastrophic east coast floods have been described by the NSW premier as a “one in 1,000-year event[1], a term that has created a great deal of confusion.

Lengthy explanations that these terms are not the same as "occurring 1,000 years apart” or “once every 1,000 years” have only added to the confusion.

The simplest explanation is that the actual meaning of “one in 1,000 years” is “having a probability of 0.1 per cent in any given year” (1 in 1,000), which raises the question: why doen’t people simply say that?

The main reason is that these terms date back to a time when most people didn’t think in terms of probabilities, and even those who did were confused about how they worked. These days we interact with probabilities all the time.

The daily weather forecast includes a percentage[2] probability of rain, and longer-term forecasts give the probabilities of higher or lower than average rainfall according to El Nino and La Nina cycles.

Financial markets bet on the probabilities or interest rates moves. Statistics and probability are taught to children in school.

But this is quite a recent development.

Until the 17th century, even the most elementary concepts of probability theory were unknown. People thought of fate and fortune as essentially unknowable. Even gamblers didn’t understand odds.

The birth of probability

Indeed, it was a request from a gambler friend[3] in about 1654 that motivated the French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal to develop the basic concepts of probability with fellow mathematician Pierre de Fermat.

(Pascal also used the idea to develop “Pascal’s wager[4]” used to demonstrate the usefulness of believing in God. The idea is that if God exists believers will be rewarded with eternal bliss. If not, they will forgo a limited number of earthly pleasures while alive. No matter how small the probability of God existing, the benefit of believing in God turns out to be infinite while the cost is finite.)

Understanding developed slowly. It was not until the mid-18th century that English clergyman Thomas Bayes was credited with the field’s most important development.

The tool bequeathed by Bayes

In its modern interpretation Bayes’ theorem[5] gives us the means to revise our view of the probability of an event in the light of evidence about what has just happened.

Whether or not something has just happened is explicitly fed into the recalculation along with updated assessments of the probability that that matters.

Bayes’ theorem, in neon, in the office of British software company HP Autonony. Wikimedia Commons, CC BY[6]

Until Bayes, most probabilities were calculated as if they were unchanging, such as the probability of getting “heads” when tossing a coin. Those probabilities could usefully be described as “one in 1,000 years”, or “on average, every second toss”.

But the probability of a severe flood changes over time as the relationship between the components that make up the weather system change. Whether a flood has occurred gives us evidence about that change.

This makes it no longer helpful to refer to a severe flood as “one in x years” event.

Read more: Bayes' Theorem: the maths tool we probably use every day, but what is it?[7]

It’s long past the time we changed the terminology of once-in-so-many years, but to what? The answer seems straightforward, though the details will be tricky.

First, we need to convert the old measures into severity scales, similar to those used for cyclones and earthquakes, but specific to each catchment.

Having done that, the probability of an event of given severity can be estimated on the basis of historical experience and updated in the light of new evidence.

How would this apply in the case of an event like the Lismore flood?

Read more: 'One of the most extreme disasters in colonial Australian history': climate scientists on the floods and our future risk[8]

The initial “one in 1,000 year” description means that such an event would be extremely unlikely if the old relationship held.

Using Bayes’ theorem, we would update the initial one in 1,000 probability on the basis of updated information about the chance the underlying relationships are changing, producing new annual probabilities each year.

This is how machine learning[9] works and how medical[10] and insurance[11] odds are updated. Sadly, the revised probabilities will almost certainly exceed one in 1,000.

References

  1. ^ one in 1,000-year event (www.smh.com.au)
  2. ^ percentage (www.bom.gov.au)
  3. ^ request from a gambler friend (www.aps.org)
  4. ^ Pascal’s wager (plato.stanford.edu)
  5. ^ Bayes’ theorem (corporatefinanceinstitute.com)
  6. ^ CC BY (creativecommons.org)
  7. ^ Bayes' Theorem: the maths tool we probably use every day, but what is it? (theconversation.com)
  8. ^ 'One of the most extreme disasters in colonial Australian history': climate scientists on the floods and our future risk (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ machine learning (www.upgrad.com)
  10. ^ medical (towardsdatascience.com)
  11. ^ insurance (thebusinessprofessor.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/one-in-1-000-years-old-flood-probabilities-no-longer-hold-water-178524

Times Magazine

IPECS Phone System in 2026: The Future of Smart Business Communication

By 2026, business communication is no longer just about making and receiving calls. It’s about speed...

With Nvidia’s second-best AI chips headed for China, the US shifts priorities from security to trade

This week, US President Donald Trump approved previously banned exports[1] of Nvidia’s powerful ...

Navman MiVue™ True 4K PRO Surround honest review

If you drive a car, you should have a dashcam. Need convincing? All I ask that you do is search fo...

Australia’s supercomputers are falling behind – and it’s hurting our ability to adapt to climate change

As Earth continues to warm, Australia faces some important decisions. For example, where shou...

Australia’s electric vehicle surge — EVs and hybrids hit record levels

Australians are increasingly embracing electric and hybrid cars, with 2025 shaping up as the str...

Tim Ayres on the AI rollout’s looming ‘bumps and glitches’

The federal government released its National AI Strategy[1] this week, confirming it has dropped...

The Times Features

Sweeten Next Year’s Australia Day with Pure Maple Syrup

Are you on the lookout for some delicious recipes to indulge in with your family and friends this ...

Operation Christmas New Year

Operation Christmas New Year has begun with NSW Police stepping up visibility and cracking down ...

FOLLOW.ART Launches the Nexus Card as the Ultimate Creative-World Holiday Gift

For the holiday season, FOLLOW.ART introduces a new kind of gift for art lovers, cultural supporte...

Bailey Smith & Tammy Hembrow Reunite for Tinder Summer Peak Season

The duo reunite as friends to embrace 2026’s biggest dating trend  After a year of headlines, v...

There is no scientific evidence that consciousness or “souls” exist in other dimensions or universes

1. What science can currently say (and what it can’t) Consciousness in science Modern neurosci...

Brand Mentions are the new online content marketing sensation

In the dynamic world of digital marketing, the currency is attention, and the ultimate signal of t...

How Brand Mentions Have Become an Effective Online Marketing Option

For years, digital marketing revolved around a simple formula: pay for ads, drive clicks, measur...

Macquarie Capital Investment Propels Brennan's Next Phase of Growth and Sovereign Tech Leadership

Brennan, a leading Australian systems integrator, has secured a strategic investment from Macquari...

Will the ‘Scandinavian sleep method’ really help me sleep?

It begins with two people, one blanket, and two very different ideas of what’s a comfortable sle...