Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media Advertising

Type of ultraviolet light most effective at killing coronavirus is also the safest to use around people

  • Written by: Karl Linden, Professor of Environmental Engineering and the Mortenson Professor in Sustainable Development, University of Colorado Boulder
Type of ultraviolet light most effective at killing coronavirus is also the safest to use around people

Scientists have long known that ultraviolet light can kill pathogens on surfaces and in air and water[1]. UV robots are used to disinfect[2] empty hospital rooms, buses and trains; UV bulbs in HVAC systems eliminate pathogens in building air; and UV lamps kill bugs in drinking water[3].

Perhaps you have seen UV wands, UV LEDs and UV air purifiers advertised as silver bullets to protect against the coronavirus. While decades of research have looked at the ability of UV light to kill many pathogens, there are no set standards for UV disinfection products with regard to the coronavirus. These products may work to kill SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, but they also may not.

I am an environmental engineer and expert in UV disinfection[4]. In May 2021, my colleagues and I set out to accurately test various UV systems and see which was the most effective[5] at killing off – or inactivating – SARS-CoV-2.

A diagram showing UV light breaking down a strand of DNA.
When UV light enters a cell, it breaks the bonds that hold DNA or RNA together. NASA/David Herring via WikimediaCommons[6]

How does UV light kill a virus?

Light is categorized by wavelength – the distance between peaks of a wave of light – and is measured in nanometers. UV wavelengths range from 100 to 400 nanometers – shorter in wavelength than the violet hues in visible light – and are invisible to the human eye. As wavelength shortens, photons of light contain higher amounts of energy.

Different wavelengths of UV light work better than others for inactivating viruses, and this depends on how well the wavelengths are absorbed by the virus’s DNA or RNA. When UV light gets absorbed, the photons of light transfer their energy to and damage the chemical bonds of the genetic material[7]. The virus is then unable to replicate or cause an infection. Researchers have also shown the proteins that viruses use to attach to a host cell and initiate infection – like the spike proteins on a coronavirus – are also vulnerable to UV light[8].

The dose of light matters too. Light can vary in intensity – bright light is more intense, and there is more energy in it than in dim light. Being exposed to a bright light for a short time can produce the same UV dose as being exposed to a dim light for a longer period. You need to know the right dose that can kill coronavirus particles at each UV wavelength.

A man with sunburned shoulders sitting on a beach. Sunburns are caused by UV light damaging skin cells. Ian Hooton/Science Photo Library via Getty Images[9]

Making ultraviolet lights safe for people

Traditional UV systems use wavelengths at or around 254 nanometers. At these wavelengths the light is dangerous to human skin and eyes, even at low doses[10]. Sunlight includes UV light near these wavelengths; anyone who has ever gotten a bad sunburn knows just how dangerous UV light can be.

However, recent research has shown that at certain UV wavelengths – specifically below 230 nanometers – the high-energy photons are absorbed by the top layers of dead skin cells[11] and don’t penetrate into the active skin layers where damage can occur. Similarly, the tear layer around eyes also blocks out these germicidal UV rays[12].

This means that at wavelengths of UV light below 230 nanometers, people can move around more freely while the air around them is being disinfected in real time.

A diagram showing a lamp above a sample of water containing the coronavirus. Researchers used this setup to test multiple different UV lights at various doses to see what it took to kill SARS-CoV-2. Karl Linden, CC BY-ND[13]

Testing different wavelengths

My colleagues and I tested five commonly used UV wavelengths to see which work best to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Specifically, we tested how large a dose is needed to kill 90% to 99.9% of the viral particles present[14].

We ran these tests in a biosafety level three facility at the University of Arizona[15] that is built to handle lethal pathogens. There we tested numerous lights across the UV spectrum, including UV LEDs that emit light at 270 and 282 nanometers, traditional UV tube lamps at 254 nanometers and a newer technology called an excited dimer, or excimer, UV source[16] at 222 nanometers.

To test each device we spiked a sample of water with millions of SARS-CoV-2 viruses and coated a petri dish with a thin layer of this mixture. We then shined UV light on the petri dish until we achieved a specific dose. Finally we examined the viral particles to see if they could still infect human cells in culture. If the viruses could infect the cells, the dose was not high enough. If the viruses did not cause an infection, the UV source at that dose had successfully killed the pathogen. We carefully repeated this process for a range of UV doses using the five different UV devices.

While all of the wavelengths we tested can inactivate SARS-CoV-2 at very low doses, the ones that required the lowest dose were the systems that emit UV light at a wavelength of 222 nanometers[17]. In our experiment, it took a dose of less than 2 millijoules of energy per square centimeter to kill 99.9% of viral particles. This translates to needing about 20 seconds to disinfect a space receiving a low intensity of short wavelength UV light, similar to that used in our test.

[Get our best science, health and technology stories. Sign up for The Conversation’s science newsletter[18].]

These 222-nanometer systems are almost twice as effective as conventional UV tube lamps, which are often used in ultraviolet disinfecting systems. But importantly, the winning lamp also happens to be the safest for humans, too. At the same UV light intensity it takes to kill 99.9% of SARS-CoV-2 in 20 seconds, a person could be safely exposed to 222-nanometer light for up to one hour and 20 minutes[19].

What this means is that widely available[20] types of UV lamp[21] lights can be used to safely knock down levels of the coronavirus with people present.

Better use of existing tech

Many places or organizations – ranging from the U.S. Air Force[22] to the Space Needle in Seattle[23] to Boeing[24] – are already using or investigating ways to use UV light in the 222 nanometer range to protect public health.

I believe that our findings are important because they quantify the exact doses needed to achieve various levels of SARS-CoV-2 control, whether that be killing 90% or 99.9% of viral particles.

Imagine coffee shops, grocery stores, school classrooms, restaurants and concert venues now made safe by this technology. And this is not a solution for just SARS-CoV-2. These technologies could help protect human health in public spaces in future times of crisis, but also during times of relative normalcy, by reducing exposure to everyday viral and bacterial threats.

References

  1. ^ kill pathogens on surfaces and in air and water (theconversation.com)
  2. ^ UV robots are used to disinfect (www.nytimes.com)
  3. ^ UV lamps kill bugs in drinking water (www.nytimes.com)
  4. ^ environmental engineer and expert in UV disinfection (scholar.google.com)
  5. ^ which was the most effective (doi.org)
  6. ^ NASA/David Herring via WikimediaCommons (commons.wikimedia.org)
  7. ^ damage the chemical bonds of the genetic material (doi.org)
  8. ^ vulnerable to UV light (doi.org)
  9. ^ Ian Hooton/Science Photo Library via Getty Images (www.gettyimages.com)
  10. ^ even at low doses (doi.org)
  11. ^ are absorbed by the top layers of dead skin cells (iuva.org)
  12. ^ tear layer around eyes also blocks out these germicidal UV rays (doi.org)
  13. ^ CC BY-ND (creativecommons.org)
  14. ^ kill 90% to 99.9% of the viral particles present (doi.org)
  15. ^ University of Arizona (environmentalscience.cals.arizona.edu)
  16. ^ excited dimer, or excimer, UV source (www.ushio.eu)
  17. ^ systems that emit UV light at a wavelength of 222 nanometers (doi.org)
  18. ^ Sign up for The Conversation’s science newsletter (theconversation.com)
  19. ^ up to one hour and 20 minutes (doi.org)
  20. ^ widely available (edenpark.com)
  21. ^ UV lamp (www.ushio.com)
  22. ^ U.S. Air Force (www.defense.gov)
  23. ^ Space Needle in Seattle (www.spaceneedle.com)
  24. ^ Boeing (www.boeing.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/type-of-ultraviolet-light-most-effective-at-killing-coronavirus-is-also-the-safest-to-use-around-people-169602

Times Magazine

How Australian Businesses Are Using AI To Cut Costs And Improve Efficiency

Artificial intelligence was once viewed by many small business owners as something futuristic, exp...

Quickest Way of Getting Rid of Your Old Cars in Brisbane?

If you are done searching for a practical solution for quickly getting rid of your old car, this w...

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the Dogs (Literally)

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

AI Guilt: It’s Real — But it is irrational

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming one of the most powerful tools ever made available to ...

Australians Are Keeping Their Cars Longer — And It’s Changing The Market

Australia’s car market is undergoing a subtle but important transformation. People are keeping th...

Streaming Fatigue: Australians Overwhelmed By Subscriptions

Streaming was once supposed to simplify entertainment. Instead, many Australians now feel overwhe...

Why Shopping Centres No Longer Feel Exciting

There was a time when going to the shopping centre felt like an event. Families spent entire Satu...

Harry And Meghan: Less Powerful As Royals, More Powerful As Content

For all the claims of “Harry and Meghan fatigue”, the world’s media still cannot stop talking abou...

Surprising things Aussies do to ‘manifest’ winning a dream home as Australia’s biggest ever prize unveiled

Dream Home Art Union has unveiled its biggest prize in its 70-year history supporting veterans - a...

The Times Features

ASX Movements Since Labor’s Budget: What Investors Are …

Australia’s share market has spent recent weeks digesting the implications of Labor’s federal budg...

QLD Day

On Saturday 6 June, parkrun events across the state will be a sea of maroon, with communities  str...

NAGNATA: ‘FUTURE = FIBRE’ — Movement 21 at AFW 2026 …

Photography by Cesar OcampoOn Day 3 of Australian Fashion Week 2026, the energy at the runway shifte...

Flu Season in Australia: Why Health Authorities Are Tak…

As winter settles across Australia, so too does the annual flu season — a recurring health challen...

Smart Supermarket Shopping: The Money-Saving Hacks Aust…

Australians are becoming smarter supermarket shoppers. Rising grocery prices, higher mortgage rep...

Kmart’s Homewares Revolution: How a Discount Retailer B…

There was a time when many Australians viewed Kmart as the place to buy low-cost basics, school su...

“People Are Spending Less”: Small Businesses Feel Austr…

Sometimes the real state of the economy is not found in Treasury papers, Reserve Bank statements o...

The Arrival of Winter: More Than Just a Date on the Cal…

Winter arrives quietly in Australia. There is no dramatic wall of snow sweeping across the nation ...

The Blood Test That Could Change Colon Cancer Screening…

A simple blood test that may one day reduce the need for colonoscopies is generating enormous inte...