The Times Australia
The Times Australia
.

The government’s big productivity challenge

  • Written by Stephen Bartos, Professor of Economics, University of Canberra


Higher productivity has quickly emerged as an economic reform[1] priority for Labor’s second term.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has laid down some markers for a productivity round table[2] in August, saying he wants it to build the “broadest possible base” for further economic reform.

The government is right to focus on productivity. Improving economic efficiency will increase real wages, help bring down inflation and interest rates, and improve living standards.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers is flagging a broad[3] productivity agenda, but acknowledges the rewards will take time to percolate through the economy:

Human capital, competition policy, technology, energy, the care economy – these are where we are going to find the productivity gains, and not quickly, but over the medium term.

Making the economy operate more efficiently is simple in concept. But Albanese and Chalmers would be well aware productivity is hard to measure, and even more difficult to shift.

The numbers are fraught

What do we mean by productivity growth? And how will it help lift the economy? The authors of the bestselling new book Abundance[4] offer this neat explanation:

People need to think up new ideas. Factories need to innovate new processes. These new ideas and new processes must be encoded into new technologies. All this is grouped under the sterile label of productivity: How much more can we produce with the same number of people and resources?

At its most basic, productivity measures[5] outputs divided by inputs – what we produce compared to the resources such as labour and capital used to produce it.

Jim Chalmers and Anthony Albanese in hi-viz and hard hats
Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - productivity a big priority. Dean Lewins/AAP[6]

But large parts of the “non-market” economy including the public service, health care and education are excluded from the official productivity figures[7].

The Australian Bureau of Statistics is working to address the gap in the data. For example, it is developing “experimental estimates[8]” for the health sector, which suggests hospital productivity has fallen.

However measurement is fraught. If a nurse, for instance, who previously cared for four patients now looks after eight, is that a productivity improvement? Or a drop in standard of care?

Flatlining productivity

Australian productivity growth has averaged just 0.4% a year since 2015 – the lowest rate[9] in 60 years.

The exception was during COVID[10], when industries with low productivity, such as accommodation and food, were shut down and those with high productivity – such as IT and communications – thrived.

The objective must be to return to, or even surpass, historical levels of productivity. However, it won’t be easy given economists have no clear idea[11] why productivity growth has fallen in Australia and overseas.

Theories include:

  • measurement problems
  • new industries
  • decline in business investment in equipment and technology
  • more service industries, where productivity is lower
  • the easy reforms have all been done.

No shortage of advice

Productivity is multidimensional, with an absurd number of moving parts. It depends on skills, technology, investment, knowledge, management, and a host of other factors. Like the movie, it’s “everything, everywhere all at once”.

The government has a plethora of advice on how to improve productivity. Scientists argue for more scientific research[12]; business lobbies for more investment breaks[13];innovators for more technological advances[14].

This poses a dilemma for the Treasurer. Most suggestions on their own would make some difference. Doing all of them would make a huge difference. Alas, government cannot do everything. It must choose where to apply its limited resources.

Beyond money and time, the government must also have appetite for the fight.

Interest groups typically support productivity reforms in principle, but resist them if they are directly affected. Every inefficient regulation or program has a supporter somewhere.

Five pillars

Jim Chalmers does not need another shopping list. He needs help to sort through options and set priorities for which fights to pick. To this end, in December year he tasked[15] the Productivity Commission[16] with new inquiries into the five main drivers – “pillars” – of higher productivity.

Read more: Labor says its second term will be about productivity reform. These ideas could help shift the dial[17]

Yet the Albanese government has already been handed a comprehensive blueprint for productivity reform.

Several workers wearing hi-viz with a traffic saying 'slow'
Over the past decade, productivity has grown at below the historical average. Joel Carrett/AAP[18]

In March 2023, the Productivity Commission released the Advancing Prosperity[19] report, which it described as a “road map”.

However, it had more of a shopping list feel, incorporating 71 recommendations and 29 “reform directives”. Many were of the “should” variety, lacking a detailed plan of how to do them.

Roughly speaking, any government only has bandwidth for one big and a few small reforms a term. It cannot implement more than 70, even if that’s ideal.

Productivity reform will succeed if it involves only a few changes – preferably those that deliver the most improvement for the least complaint.

Some proposed measures are desirable but controversial. The tax system[20], for example, is crying out for improvement, but the government is unlikely to take it on.

Reforming occupational licences[21] to make it easier for tradies to move states is a more modest aim. It would not generate the same productivity gains, but politically would be simpler to implement.

Nothing to fear

Finally, some words of caution.

Productivity is not code for exploiting workers. As The Guardian recently noted[22]:

When most people hear the word ‘productivity’ they think of their boss wanting them to take on more duties for the same pay. That’s not the case. It’s about getting more out of the hours you work.

Working harder to get the same result is in fact a drop in productivity. Working shorter hours for the same outputs is productivity growth, with the benefits seen in better work-life balance.

Nor is productivity just about producing more outputs. Who needs more useless stuff?

And statistics can mislead, because they measure the value of production, not the quality. A broader accounting for production, incorporating society and the environment, would help the productivity debate avoid this trap.

Albanese and Chalmers readily acknowledge the government can do more on productivity. Anyone with an interest in driving a more efficient economy, higher real wages and better living standards will hold them to their word.

This article is part of The Conversation’s series examining the productivity dilemma.

References

  1. ^ reform (theconversation.com)
  2. ^ productivity round table (www.abc.net.au)
  3. ^ broad (ministers.treasury.gov.au)
  4. ^ Abundance (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ measures (www.rba.gov.au)
  6. ^ Dean Lewins/AAP (photos.aap.com.au)
  7. ^ figures (www.abs.gov.au)
  8. ^ experimental estimates (www.abs.gov.au)
  9. ^ lowest rate (www.afr.com)
  10. ^ during COVID (www.pc.gov.au)
  11. ^ no clear idea (www.worldbank.org)
  12. ^ scientific research (theconversation.com)
  13. ^ investment breaks (www.bca.com.au)
  14. ^ technological advances (www.uts.edu.au)
  15. ^ tasked (ministers.treasury.gov.au)
  16. ^ Productivity Commission (www.pc.gov.au)
  17. ^ Labor says its second term will be about productivity reform. These ideas could help shift the dial (theconversation.com)
  18. ^ Joel Carrett/AAP (photos.aap.com.au)
  19. ^ Advancing Prosperity (www.pc.gov.au)
  20. ^ tax system (theconversation.com)
  21. ^ licences (ministers.treasury.gov.au)
  22. ^ noted (www.theguardian.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/hard-to-measure-and-difficult-to-shift-the-governments-big-productivity-challenge-257968

Waiting too long for public dental care? Here’s why the system is struggling – and how to fix it

Just over one-third of Australians[1] are eligible for public dental services, which provide free or low cost ...

Times Magazine

Building an AI-First Culture in Your Company

AI isn't just something to think about anymore - it's becoming part of how we live and work, whether we like it or not. At the office, it definitely helps us move faster. But here's the thing: just using tools like ChatGPT or plugging AI into your wo...

Data Management Isn't Just About Tech—Here’s Why It’s a Human Problem Too

Photo by Kevin Kuby Manuel O. Diaz Jr.We live in a world drowning in data. Every click, swipe, medical scan, and financial transaction generates information, so much that managing it all has become one of the biggest challenges of our digital age. Bu...

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

The Times Features

Flipping vs. Holding: Which Investment Strategy Is Right for You?

Are you wondering whether flipping a property or holding onto it is the better investment strategy? The answer isn’t one-size-fits-all. Both strategies have distinct advantages a...

Why Everyone's Talking About Sea Moss - And Should You Try It Too?

Sea moss - a humble marine plant that’s been used for centuries - is making a major comeback in modern wellness circles. And it’s not just a trend. With growing interest from athle...

A Guide to Smarter Real Estate Accounting: What You Might Be Overlooking

Real estate accounting can be a complex terrain, even for experienced investors and property managers. From tracking rental income to managing property expenses, the financial in...

What Is the Dreamtime? Understanding Aboriginal Creation Stories Through Art

Aboriginal culture is built on the deep and important meaning of Dreamtime, which links beliefs and history with the elements that make life. It’s not just myths; the Dreamtime i...

How Short-Term Lenders Offer Long-Lasting Benefits in Australia

In the world of personal and business finance, short-term lenders are often viewed as temporary fixes—quick solutions for urgent cash needs. However, in Australia, short-term len...

Why School Breaks Are the Perfect Time to Build Real Game Skills

School holidays provide uninterrupted time to focus on individual skill development Players often return sharper and more confident after structured break-time training Holid...