Why Real Estate Agents Should Ask Vendors to Fund Advertising on The Times Property for Sale Section


In Australian real estate, one principle has always separated average campaigns from exceptional ones: exposure drives outcomes. The more qualified buyers see a property, the stronger the competition—and the better the result for the vendor.

Yet many agents still default to a narrow advertising mix—major portals, a signboard, and perhaps a social media push—while overlooking one of the most effective and underutilised channels available today: high-traffic digital news platforms with engaged local audiences.

For agents looking to deliver stronger results—and justify their value—there is a compelling case to ask vendors to allocate part of their marketing budget to The Times Property for Sale section.

The Core Reality: Marketing Is Not a Cost—It’s a Multiplier

Vendors often resist marketing spend because they see it as an expense. The role of the agent is to reframe that thinking:

Marketing is an investment that directly influences the sale price.

A property that reaches:

…is far more likely to achieve:

Limiting exposure to one or two platforms is not a strategy—it’s a constraint.

The Problem With Portal-Only Campaigns

Major property portals dominate the market—but they come with limitations:

In contrast, news-based property placement creates context, authority, and focus.

The Strategic Advantage of The Times Property Section

TheTimes.com.au delivers something fundamentally different:

1. Audience Intent Beyond “Active Buyers”

Property portals capture active searchers.
News platforms capture:

These are often the buyers who:

2. High Daily Traffic = Continuous Exposure

With tens of thousands of daily readers, The Times provides:

This creates top-of-mind awareness, which is critical in competitive markets.

3. Editorial Environment Builds Credibility

A listing placed within a respected news platform benefits from:

A property presented alongside economic, business, and lifestyle content is elevated beyond a standard listing.

4. Less Competition, More Attention

On a portal, your listing competes with hundreds nearby.
On The Times:

Why Vendors Should Pay—And Why Agents Should Ask

It is standard practice for vendors to fund:

Adding The Times property placement is a logical extension of this.

The agent’s responsibility is to explain:

Framed correctly, the conversation shifts from:

“Do you want to spend more?”

to:

“Do you want to maximise your result?”

Positioning the Conversation With Vendors

Agents should present The Times placement as:

A Premium Layer, Not a Replacement

A Competitive Edge

A Proven Marketing Principle

The Commercial Reality for Agents

There is also a business case for agents:

1. Better Results = Stronger Reputation

Agents who consistently achieve:

…win more listings.

2. Differentiation in Listing Presentations

Most agents present similar marketing plans.

Including The Times allows you to say:

“We don’t just list your property—we actively promote it to a broader audience.”

3. Justification of Professional Fees

When agents demonstrate a proactive marketing strategy, their commission becomes easier to defend.

Ideal Properties for The Times Placement

While all listings benefit from exposure, The Times is particularly effective for:

A Shift in Mindset

The most successful agents already understand this:

Selling property is not just about listing—it’s about marketing aggressively and intelligently.

Relying solely on traditional channels is no longer enough in a digital-first environment where attention is fragmented and competition is constant.

Conclusion

The question is no longer whether additional exposure helps—it unquestionably does.

The real question for agents and vendors is:

Are you prepared to invest in the level of exposure required to achieve the best possible result?

The Times Property for Sale section offers:

For agents, the opportunity is clear:

Because in real estate, the difference between an average result and an exceptional one often comes down to a simple factor:

Who saw the property—and how many of them were ready to act.